Di's paranoia:
It's not a fairy tale
By SARAKAY SMULLENS
Published November 10, 2003
in the Philadelphia Daily News
WAS PRINCESS Diana the paranoid "mental
case" the Royals paint her to be?
Her shocking letter recently revealed by butler and confidante
Paul Burrell shows Diana feared for her life and predicted it would
end in a car crash. My work in family therapy has taught me that
even the exceedingly paranoid are often that way for very good
reason.
Diana, seemingly blessed by enchanting fortune, provides the most
jolting of ironies. Strip away the designer clothes and jewels, and
she's the symbol of what societies all over the world do to women
who threaten an economic, political or cultural power base.
Families and partners do it, too. I have seen a husband, told by
his wife that she would no longer tolerate his affairs, push her
into moving traffic.
I have spoken with children told by grandparents that if they
could get away with it, they would kill their mothers.
Remember the Watergate years when the effervescent Martha
Mitchell, wife of Attorney General John Mitchell, told the truth.
Martha, branded a nutcase, was overmedicated, locked in her room and
denied access to her child.
And what about the brides of India who, as police look the other
way, are killed by a mother-in-law they dare question? And female
circumcision?
Sigmund Freud wrote about "genital power," that indescribable
something that Hollywood has called "It." Well, lemme tell you, many
men are scared to death of "It." But they are just as scared of
Thinking Power in a woman, and they have lots of company in that
department, too.
Prince Charles was always a wimp. Do you remember when he asked
his mother's permission to kiss Diana on the balcony on their
wedding day? He didn't have the courage to commit to Camilla Parker
when they were young, so she married someone else. But in time they
were an item again. Because Charles needed an heir, Camilla
handpicked Diana, assuming she was too meek and weak to threaten them.
The Rottweiler, as Diana called Camilla, was proven wrong. A
devoted and hands-on mother, Diana made sure her children enjoyed as
normal a life as possible.
Yes, Diana had huge emotional problems, but there were reasons
for them: How would you handle learning of your husband's ongoing
affair on your honeymoon? Despite loneliness and judgment lapses
Diana gained knowledge, power, stature. And her subjects loved her
because she cared. To say that the Royals were not pleased by her
popularity is an understatement.
The British version of our CIA is the MI6, and a group within it
is fiercely devoted to the royal family. Diana, warned that her life
was in jeopardy, became so terrified that she stopped using palace
security.
Conventional wisdom has blamed the paparazzi and the drunken
state of her driver for her death.
Yet, a blinding light that preceded the crash, possibly from a
weapon, was reported in the tunnel. And the restaurant bill showed
only moderate alcohol consumption. Why wasn't Diana rushed to a
hospital? Predictably, her bodyguard claims to remember absolutely
nothing.
Diana's oldest son, William, has been trotted out cynically to
protect what the Royals call "the family business" and discredit
"these revelations."
But what seems clear from these very same "revelations" is that
Diana wanted the public to investigate any untimely death.
Though it's a tall order, when William is older, he may be strong
enough to face the truth, however painful, and use it wisely to meet
his destiny.
And this would be a monument to his mother's dearest, deepest
dreams.